data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf50e/cf50e68a01df66270050596b8a386490522a2861" alt=""
Following comments in
Monday's story here at TBNN, the author of
What Saint Paul Really Said and
What Moses Really Saw, N.T. Wright quickly wrote his latest addition to the world of Christian literature entitled
What Spurgeon Really Said. Wright's book examines numerous quotes from the famed 19th-century baptist preacher seemingly indicating that he was a Calvinist. Wright argues that even though the mountain of evidence seems to indicate clearly that Spurgeon was a Calvinist, that we have somehow misunderstood what he was trying to say, that statements such as,
"That Christ should offer an atonement and satisfaction for the sins of all men, and that afterwards some of those very men should be punished for the sins for which Christ had already atoned, appears to me to be the most monstrous iniquity that could ever have been imputed to Saturn, to Janus, to the goddess of the Thugs, or to the most diabolical heathen deities." have just been misinterpreted, and that Spurgeon was not necessarily defending the doctrine of particular redemption.
Be sure to pick up your copy of
What Spurgeon Really Said today and become even more confused about things that are clear and understandable.